Should Smoking Be Banned Or Not Essay Examples

IELTS Writing Task 2 Sample 740 - Smoking should be banned in public places

Details
Last Updated: Friday, 28 April 2017 17:53
Written by IELTS Mentor
Hits: 13698

IELTS Writing Task 2/ IELTS Essay:

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

Smoking not only harms the smoker, but also those who are nearby. Therefore, smoking should be banned in public places.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience.

Write at least 250 words.

Model Answer 1:
The earlier we can ban  smoking in public places, the better it would be for the human kind. Having foreseen the same, many offices and governing bodies imposed a strict ban on public smoking. This measure is generally applauded by the majority of mass. However, the opposing minority interrupt this ban as an act of arrest on one's free will. Let us discourse on this moot issue below.

It is generally agreed and even proven with scientific studies, that smoking is injurious to health. Health problems that smoking can induce are numerous. Cancer is among the major detrimental effects of smoking on one’s health.  As it is rightly displayed on the cigar packets , smoking is one of the primary factors leading to cancer. Furthermore, effects of smoking on the systemic and peripheral circulation in the human body are appalling, as put forward by medical experts. The havoc of this insane habit is so horrifying, that research points towards its possible harmful effects on unborn children, even. Smoking is considered as a culprit among the many, behind the congenital birth defects and anomalies.

Another factor significant to this context would be the financial constraints imposed by smoking. In many developing countries, where people work on daily wages, the habit of smoking has an atrocious impact on their quality of life. In the majority of the mediocre families, around the world, smoking drains the significant part of their family budgets. For example, I witnessed many problems with reference to my father being a chronic smoker and the financial crisis it caused.

The amount of carbon and other toxic elements exhaled to the atmosphere by active smokers has reached such dizzy heights that its effect on passive smokers is more or less a reality now. In fact, the effect of first-hand smoke is seen permeable to even the second and third-hand smokers in the spectrum. The significance of the public ban on smoking is not just justifying but a necessity as it calls for. As a result, it is widely banned in some offices and institutions. Awareness programmes are being conducted all around the world against this habit.

Though the public ban on smoking is an individual constraint to one's freedom, considering the passive effects of smoking I would strongly accord win the ban. In my view, this would be a punitive measure to safeguard the health and wealth of the public or the society.

[ Written by - Vineeth V. ]

 

Model Answer 2:
Smoking has inevitably been a concern of governments around the globe considering how to manage and educate smoking people. This is due largely to the danger of the substance contained in the cigarettes, nicotine. As its drawback may also occur for the people near the smokers, policies related to this, particularly in public places, should be taken into account; whether it should be banned or not.

I personally think that forbidding such dangerous activity will be much beneficial that it can prevent others from having a vulnerable respiratory system. Moreover, this can maintain the places so clean that people could always find them fascinating with less air pollution. However, governments should consciously provide some special places which, in this case, can be used for smoking.

On the other hand, people who have currently been addicted to smoke would feel hard to avoid smoking in such places. As a result, they may smoke breaking the rule and not even feeling guilty. For this reason, there are two steps then to encounter this probable emerging problem. First, some strict law and appropriate punishment such as to pay more tax or to give any charity orphans or others needing. Second, education is one of the most prominent and essential ways to change peoples’ belief in terms of having their cigarette burnt.

However, banning such activity in public places is not merely a way to prevent others from the harms of smokes, but it will, to a larger extent, possibly be able to elevate people’s awareness of how dangerous smoking is.

To sum up, despite being a hard thing for smokers to not smoke, the policy which bans smoking in public places should be applied in order to save others. Nonetheless, people’s education in terms of the drawbacks of smoking is a part of this aim.

[ Written by - Ahmad Munjizun ]

IELTS Writing Task 2 Sample 1125 - Many people say smoking should be banned

Details
Last Updated: Thursday, 31 August 2017 13:16
Written by IELTS Mentor
Hits: 6834

IELTS Writing Task 2/ IELTS Essay:

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

Write about the following topic:

Many people say smoking should be banned and some say it is not a good idea. What is your opinion on this?

Use your own experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant experiences.

You should write at least 250 words.

Sample Answer 1: (Public smoking should be prohibited but complete ban on smoking should be made slowly and with proper planning.)
Banning smoking is a controversial issue as many people strongly support this ban while others disagree with it. It has been around for centuries and in many countries public smoking is prohibited and against the law while it is open in many other countries. There are discussions and arguments whether smoking should be banned completely or not.

First of all, smoking is detrimental to health. It causes lung cancer which ultimately leads to death. It might take long time to show symptoms but it always happens. Secondly, it is a waste of money as smokers spend a lot of money on cigarette. Addiction to smoking leads to addiction to marijuana, yaba etc. Eventually, the addicted people get involved in different types of crimes. They start collecting money by stealing, lying and robbing and the severity of the crime keeps on increasing. Moreover, smoking not only harm the smoker but also people around them. Recent studies on smoking suggest that passive smoking is as harmful as active smoking.  

On the contrary, tobacco industry is the source of huge tax for government. Government makes best utilization of the tax money by building schools, mosques, overhaul streets etc. Thousands of people work in cigarette related industries and this creates a huge job opportunities. If smoking is banned completely, these people will become unemployed. Another vague benefit of smoking is that smokers believe smoking refreshes their minds and relieves them from tension and stress, though it has not been scientifically proved. Some people think that banning smoking is like imposing restriction on people's freedom and they completely oppose the idea of imposing restrictions on smoking.  

Up to this point of view, we see that there are opinions for and against the banning of smoking. I believe, government should think rationally and wisely before they make any decision about prohibiting smoking. Personally I believe that public smoking should be prohibited and any violation of this rule should be penalized but complete ban on smoking should be made slowly and with proper planning.

[Written by - Ruhit Sharma]

 

Sample Answer 2: (Agreement with stating an alternative plan)
People have different opinions about imposing restriction on smoking as some people believe that smoking should be totally banned while others disagree with it. The following essay will discuss about both opinions in details followed by my own opinion and a rational conclusion.
 
On the one hand, it is understandable if several people dislike the controversial idea that smoking should be banned in all places. Firstly, they believe that everybody have their own right in doing things they like. Smoking is a preference and It is up to the individual themselves whether they would like to smoke or not. Secondly, prohibiting smoking will also affect the economic condition as cigarette factories absorb so many employments. If smoking is totally banned then many of the factories will be closed and will result a high unemployment rate. Finally, the high amount of tax the government collects from the tobacco industries will no longer be available as well.
 
On the other hand, it is a fact that smoking has many negative effects for the smokers themselves. Based on the researches of some experts, smoking has become the main trigger to some serious diseases, such as lung cancer and heart attack. Besides that, smoking would also have a serious threat for the passive smokers. People who do not smoke but inhale the smoke of active smokers will also have a risk of lung cancer as well. Therefore, many people think that smoking should be totally banned, as it could have a serious effect to both the active and passive smokers.
 
In my opinion, I personally support the idea that smoking should be totally banned in all places because smoking is dangerous for our health. But before executing the idea, the government must have an alternative plan for the employees of the cigarettes factories because they might be unemployed. The government could expand and developed a new industry therefore these employees could be allocated to the new area.

[Written by - Darwin Lesmana ]

0 Replies to “Should Smoking Be Banned Or Not Essay Examples”

Lascia un Commento

L'indirizzo email non verrĂ  pubblicato. I campi obbligatori sono contrassegnati *